After having visited many different galleries in the Lower East Side, I
would like to compare three of the ones I liked the most to the
galleries I attended in Chelsea. As I began thinking about it, I
realized it wouldn’t be easy comparing the Lower East Side galleries to
Chelsea galleries, since both locations represent a wide variety of
amazing artworks. Although both areas have a lot of similarities, LES
galleries offer a wider variety of modern style “edgy” artworks than the
ones in Chelsea. Most of Chelsea's galleries represent old cultures
which are opposite to what you can find in LES galleries. Displaying
such modern art, LES attracts a different, younger crowd of contemporary
art lovers. There I found some galleries which contained provocative,
and maybe some would say very challenging, works of art. I also found
galleries like Tatyana Murray’s, (“In the Woods”) that contains amazing
artworks you won’t find in Chelsea. I don't think I've ever seen boxes
with images that are illuminated by LED which give them a ghostly
effect. I was amazed by this exhibition. I was also quite impressed by
the work at the “Strange Loop” and “Untitled” galleries. These
galleries seemed to match my personality with such precision, that they
instantaneously engaged my attention. All of them were influenced by pop
culture and/or contain some elements found in pop culture, which makes
them different from what is shown in Chelsea. I wouldn't say that they
cater to the same type of art collectors, but I think that Chelsea's
collectors would definitely find interest in the LES galleries seeing as
how some of them do have similar artworks. Here, just like in Chelsea,
they can find a wide selection of visual art consisting of prints,
paintings, sculptures, photography, video, etc. The level of their
interest may vary because of the contemporary subject or provoking
context they would find in some of LES's artworks. The surrounding area
definitely affected the way I viewed and built my opinion on the
artworks I found there. I find it more interesting to walk around and
learn about artworks and the artists who created them, in small galleries that
look like shops or book stores as opposed to big, officially looking galleries like in Chelsea.
Galleries:
1. "Strange Loop Gallery"
2. "UNTITLED" Gallery
3. Tatyana Murray "In the Woods"
Tuesday, May 28, 2013
Tuesday, May 14, 2013
“Public Art Reaction”
Public art is a gift to all of us from
amazing talented artists who doesn't mind to share it for free. The
greatest thing about public art is that it's accessible to all. New
York is filled with beautiful artworks that you cannot just pass by.
One of my favorite works of art in a public places is the “LOVE”
sculpture on 6th ave in Manhattan. I remember the first
time I saw it I instantly “fell in love with it”.
The idea of this public artwork is very
simple and deep at the same time. I think that Robert Indiana, the
American artists who created this beautiful masterpiece just wanted
to remind people that love is very powerful. I think that he also
wanted to say that we can make each other happier by spreading free
love and positive warming emotions that we experience when we love.
Love can be different and what I like about this particular artwork
is that it always reminds me of love being the key to everything!
“LOVE” sculpture perfectly interacts with it's surroundings,
especially in the center of Manhattan. The territory it's placed on
has a plenty of space so people can even take group pictures with the
giant sculpture. Every time I'm in that area I see people smiling and
taking photographs with“LOVE”. Just a thought of how powerful
this sculpture is in a sense of emotions it evokes in people makes it
very unique and effective. I find this artwork to be a benefit to
it's surroundings since I always looked at Manhattan as at business
area that mostly has skyscrapers. This particular artwork brings only
positive energy to that area and makes it even more popular and
attractive to tourists and passers by. The “LOVE” sculpture could
fit anywhere in the city. You can't go wrong with this artwork, it
would benefit any area of New York by making people smile and
enjoying taking pictures with it. We don't need more words to
understand what this public artwork is about, each of us can find his
own connection with it. We all need some free love in such a tough
and sometimes even cold big city like New York and I would be honored
to thank Robert Indiana personally for sharing such an amazing
artwork with us.
Artist: Robert Indiana
Title: "LOVE" (Sculpture)
Medium: COR-TEN steel
Year: c 1970
Tuesday, April 30, 2013
“Chelsea Galleries Reaction”
Sometimes we look at a work of art and
realize that we definitely want to have it in our apartment or house.
For example when I'm walking through a museum and see a painting that
I like I can even imagine it hanging in my living room or in a
hallway of my house. This is when I decide that this particular
artwork has a value, worth my investment and has to be in my artwork
collection.
This time I would like talk about four
different art works that I picked from Chelsea Galleries and look at
them as if I were an art collector. The first two items I would like
to talk about have their own interesting and unique style, and that's
why they immediately caught my attention.
The color photograph "Perchten" from Yossi Milo
Gallery's series “Wilder Mann”
is a very fascinating piece of art. The reason why I would love to have it
in my art collection is the idea and style of this artwork. A
full-length portrait of a person wearing an animal skin makes this
artwork very powerful. The massive figure of a beast or
something that looks more like half animal and half human, reminds me
of a character from some fantasy movie that I loved to watch when I
was a child. Charles Fréger's work is definitely a good investment
because of it's unique style and the interesting story behind it that
you can create in your own imagination.
The last two artworks unfortunately
will never be able to get in my art collection since they evoked some
unpleasant emotions the first time I saw them. They are simply don't
worth me making any investments in because I couldn't find anything
about them that I like.
Zhang Xiaogang's exhibition attracted
my attention but it left me feeling a little unpleasant inside. The
real size
I had the same reaction when I saw a
sculpture “Cupid” by Richard Hughes in Anton Kern Gallery. I 'm
not even sure if I can call it a sculpture since it looks like a
little piece that was left from an original artwork. I would never
buy this work of art. If I were to get it as a gift I would keep in
my basement because It doesn't evoke any aesthetic emotions that real
art is suppose to evoke within a viewer.
1. Yossi Milo Gallery
Charles Fréger
"Perchten,Werfen,Austria"
2010-2011
2. Pace Gallery
Adrian Ghenie
"Persian Miniature"
2013
3. Pace Gallery
Zhang Xiaogang
"Baby #1"
2013
"Baby #1"
2013
4. Anton Kern Gallery
Richard Hughes
“Cupid”
2013
Friday, April 19, 2013
Wednesday, April 17, 2013
Lib 110 Project. Imitation
Pablo
Picasso is one of my favorite artists. It was very hard to pick a
certain work of art to paint an imitation of because there are too many
that I like. Finally I decided to stop on two of his artworks that
inspired me in some way and led me to draw my painting. Picasso's
works like "Self Portrait" and "Woman in a Hat with
Pompoms and a Printed Blouse”, helped me create the image in my
head and gave me an idea for my own artwork.
My
painting has a similar style and elements from these two particular
works of art because I used similar lines, shapes and colors to
create my imitation. From those two paintings I borrowed the style of
drawing eyes, nose, ears and lips. I also mixed bright and warm
colors together and made some parts of the face bigger or smaller.
I
tried to focus more on the painting of the woman instead because
bright colors and abstract style immediately attracted my attention.
This is the way I saw the imitation of that painting in my head. I
decided to add a little bit of imagination to my artwork to make it
more unique. I think It didn't change the point of imitation
Tuesday, April 16, 2013
“Illustrate a Story” "Project 3”
Every girl is dreaming of the true love. Time is changing and if
many years ago real feelings, friendship and strong relationships
were valued, nowadays it's a little different. People are trying to
stay away from drama and obligations. It also happens because people
are afraid to get hurt. Most relationships fall apart in our time,
but there are still beautiful love stories out there that I was able
to discover today.
While listening to the story of MaryAnn and Jim Fletcher could feel how strong their feelings are. I found this story very touching and unique. Both met when they were in first grade. They were in relationships for a long time after that and nine years later they decided to go their separate ways.
My favorite part of the story was when twenty two years later they met again. At this time they realized that they are just meant to be together and that they always loved each other through the years, even when they were not together. I call it a true love. This is one of the sweetest stories I've ever heard.
In my illustration I painted their love story from the very beginning of the relationship to the very end. It's a sequence of events that happened to them. On the top left I painted both of them as kids from the first time they met and continue counter clockwise. I then drew their relationships when they were teenagers. Then there was a break up that hurt them both and made them go their own ways. The next picture is of MaryAnn receiving a text message from Jim Fletcher twenty two years later. Then I painted them meeting each other after so many years and the last picture shows that they are together and love each other as they always did.
You can see the heart on the top of my painting. It represents a real big love. It started when they were little and on the right side of the heart they are grown ups and are living happily ever after.
http://storycorps.org/listen/jim-fletcher-and-his-wife-maryann/
While listening to the story of MaryAnn and Jim Fletcher could feel how strong their feelings are. I found this story very touching and unique. Both met when they were in first grade. They were in relationships for a long time after that and nine years later they decided to go their separate ways.
My favorite part of the story was when twenty two years later they met again. At this time they realized that they are just meant to be together and that they always loved each other through the years, even when they were not together. I call it a true love. This is one of the sweetest stories I've ever heard.
In my illustration I painted their love story from the very beginning of the relationship to the very end. It's a sequence of events that happened to them. On the top left I painted both of them as kids from the first time they met and continue counter clockwise. I then drew their relationships when they were teenagers. Then there was a break up that hurt them both and made them go their own ways. The next picture is of MaryAnn receiving a text message from Jim Fletcher twenty two years later. Then I painted them meeting each other after so many years and the last picture shows that they are together and love each other as they always did.
You can see the heart on the top of my painting. It represents a real big love. It started when they were little and on the right side of the heart they are grown ups and are living happily ever after.
http://storycorps.org/listen/jim-fletcher-and-his-wife-maryann/
Tuesday, April 9, 2013
“Design in Our Lives” (Field Trip 3)
“Ergonomics
is the science of making things comfy”.* It
can be used in anything including design. Let's talk about design as
a practical application of art work. In this blog I would like to
discuss four items I found at the Museum of Modern Art and analyze
these items by categorizing them as “high functionality” and “low
functionality”.
The
first and my favorite item I want to talk about is called “Mine
Kafon Wind-PoweredDeminer”. It was created by Massoud Hassani in
2011. I would like to give you a quick background story about the
artist himself, so we could understand where his idea came from.
“Hassani
grew up in Qasaba, Kabul. At the time he was 5 there were several
wars going on. His brother Mahmud and I him played every day on the
fields surrounded with
the highest mountains in their neighborhood.
When they were young they learned how to make their own toys. One of
his favorites was a small rolling object that was
wind-powered. They
used it to race against the other kids on the fields around our
neighborhood. There was always a strong wind waving towards the
mountains. While they
were racing against each other, their toys
rolled too fast and too far. Mostly they landed in
areas where they
couldn’t be retrieved because of landmines. Many friends of Hassani
were injured or killed by landmines. Almost 20 years later, he went
back to Qasaba and
made those toys again. That was his graduation
project for the Design Academy
Eindhoven (2011).
The
reason why I think that the Wind Powered Deminer has high
functionality is
because it can be very useful if you put it into a
mine field. It will go around where the wind blows it and it will
detonates mines, so people don't have to go out there and risk their
lives. Mine Kafon Wind Powered Deminer doesn't even need a motor
(which is not good for the pollution), it moves through being blown
by the wind. It can be successfully used in dangerous war zones
located close to villages and places where civilians are. Another
good side of this artwork is that it's pretty easy to make because
the material Hassani used to create it is very cheap and simple.
The
next artwork I'll be discussing is an Earthquake Proof Table. From my perspective it has high functionality. First of all because just like
the item I was talking about before, it saves people's lives. Earthquakes can occur anywhere in the
earth and I think that this Earthquake Proof Table should be used as a regular table just in case of any unpredictable nature disaster that can destroy building and harm people. It also made out of the lightweight material, so even two children can pick it up and move it on their own. It went through vertical impact tests and and it was proved that it can handle 1 ton. This table can definitely be used for most everyday classroom activities or at homes and offices, that's why I put it under category of high functional designed artworks.
And the two last items I would like to analyze, I consider as to be low functionality, from my point of view.
The first one is a “Very
round Chair” which is made out of steel. It caught my attention
because of the way it looks and the way it was made, but the way it was designed
makes it less possible to be used in our everyday life. The chair was
made so you can't even sit on it. It can be used only as a decoration
at home or in the office,but nothing more than that.The final artwork that I decided to put under the category of low functionality is called “Basic House” by Martin Ruiz de Azua. I have to admit that I liked the idea and the concept of his artwork, but I don't think it can be used as a homeless shelter as stated in the description. There are two
reasons why it has a low functionality and the first one is the size. The original size of it is pretty big, which means that in a big city, you doubtfully can use it on a street. Another big and as I think the main reason it can't be used by homeless people is the fact that it can attract too much of attention, which can lead to robbing, bothering, attacking. Homeless people are trying to hide in places where they won't be bothered and with this shelter it's impossible not to attract unwanted attention. “Basic House” is a very interesting idea, but unfortunately I can't put it under the category of high functionality.
At
the end I would like to say that it's ok If you would disagree with
me. My
opinion is very subjective and maybe from your perspective the items
I selected as “low functional design” could be approved as “high
functional”. There's
no right or wrong because even “low functional” design can still
be practical.
*Sources of information:
http://ergonomics.about.com/od/ergonomicbasics/a/ergo101.htm
1. Massoud Hassani
Mine Kafon wind-powered deminer, 2011.
Bamboo and biodegradable plastics.
87 x 87 x 87" (221 x 221 x 221 cm).
2. Ido Bruno, 1963; Arthur Brutter, 1982.
*Sources of information:
http://ergonomics.about.com/od/ergonomicbasics/a/ergo101.htm
1. Massoud Hassani
Mine Kafon wind-powered deminer, 2011.
Bamboo and biodegradable plastics.
87 x 87 x 87" (221 x 221 x 221 cm).
2. Ido Bruno, 1963; Arthur Brutter, 1982.
EPT
- Earthquake Proof Table,2010
Steel
and birch plywood
28
3/8 x 47 1/4 x 23 5/8" (72 x 120 x 60 cm)
3. Louise
Campbell, 1970
Veryround
Chair, 2006
Made out of steel.
4. Martin
Ruiz de Azua,1965
“Basic
House”, 1999.
Polyester.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




