Monday, March 18, 2013
Sunday, March 10, 2013
Good Art vs. Bad Art.
I have a different perspective on what
good art is and bad art is. In my opinion, good art is something
that makes me think of what
message was the artist
attempting to deliver
to us. It's something that catches my attention, impresses me
with it's style and technique, inspires me or just simply takes my
breath away. If a piece of artwork makes me want to think about it,
talk about after I see it, it's good art.
Let me give you an example of what I think good art is:
Beautiful masterpiece by Jean Raoux, 1700s
"Orpheus and Eurydice"
I appreciate this type of art because I
know that the artist put his time, thoughts, feelings and maybe even
some experience from his own life to “breath” life in it, so we,
even hundreds of years later could still feel it when we are looking
at this painting. If art offers me something to think about, if it
amazes me and if I can read some kind of story behind it then I can
call it a good art.
You may disagree with me and my choice, but the next painting I want to talk about is an example of bad art and I will explain why:
“Black Square” by Kazimir
Malevich, 1915
Unfortunately I don't feel the same
about the “Black Square”, a very famous painting of Kazimir
Malevich. I call this bad art because it never got into my heart or
my mind. The technique and style that was used on this artwork never
impressed me because it's too simple. I believe that any artwork is a
reflection of an artist it belongs to, and if I can't find the
connection with an artist through his or her work, then I'm instantly
losing my interest in it. I see nothing when I'm looking at this
painting because to me, there's no meaning in it, it's just a black
square. I couldn't see the thought process of the artist and this
is where the connection was lost. I hope one day I will be able to understand the meaning and the idea of this artwork but now I can't use it more than just an example of bad art.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)